🔗 Share this article

When I am a game master, I historically avoided significant use of chance during my tabletop roleplaying adventures. I tended was for the plot and what happened in a game to be shaped by player choice instead of pure luck. That said, I opted to alter my method, and I'm very pleased with the outcome.

The Inspiration: Seeing 'Luck Rolls'

An influential actual-play show utilizes a DM who frequently calls for "chance rolls" from the adventurers. The process entails choosing a type of die and assigning possible results tied to the result. This is at its core no unlike rolling on a random table, these are devised in the moment when a course of events lacks a obvious conclusion.

I decided to try this approach at my own table, mostly because it seemed engaging and offered a departure from my normal practice. The results were fantastic, prompting me to reconsider the perennial tension between pre-determination and spontaneity in a tabletop session.

An Emotional In-Game Example

In a recent session, my players had just emerged from a large-scale fight. Afterwards, a player inquired after two friendly NPCs—a pair—had made it. In place of choosing an outcome, I asked for a roll. I told the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. The stakes were: a low roll, both would perish; a middling roll, a single one succumbed; a high roll, they survived.

The player rolled a 4. This resulted in a deeply emotional moment where the adventurers found the remains of their companions, still united in death. The group conducted funeral rites, which was especially significant due to earlier character interactions. As a parting touch, I decided that the forms were suddenly restored, showing a enchanted item. By chance, the item's contained spell was precisely what the party lacked to solve another pressing story problem. One just plan such serendipitous story beats.

Sharpening DM Agility

This experience made me wonder if randomization and making it up are in fact the essence of this game. While you are a detail-oriented DM, your ability to adapt can rust. Players reliably excel at ignoring the best constructed plans. Therefore, a effective DM must be able to think quickly and invent details on the fly.

Utilizing on-the-spot randomization is a great way to develop these talents without straying too much outside your comfort zone. The key is to use them for low-stakes situations that have a limited impact on the campaign's main plot. To illustrate, I would not employ it to establish if the king's advisor is a secret enemy. But, I could use it to determine whether the party reach a location moments before a major incident occurs.

Empowering Player Agency

Luck rolls also works to maintain tension and foster the feeling that the adventure is responsive, progressing in reaction to their decisions immediately. It reduces the sense that they are merely pawns in a pre-written story, thereby enhancing the collaborative foundation of roleplaying.

This philosophy has always been part of the original design. Original D&D were reliant on encounter generators, which fit a playstyle focused on treasure hunting. Although current D&D often emphasizes plot-driven play, leading many DMs to feel they need exhaustive notes, it's not necessarily the best approach.

Striking the Sweet Spot

It is perfectly no issue with thorough preparation. However, equally valid no problem with relinquishing control and permitting the rolls to determine certain outcomes in place of you. Authority is a significant factor in a DM's job. We require it to facilitate play, yet we often struggle to give some up, at times when doing so might improve the game.

The core advice is this: Do not fear of letting go of your plan. Experiment with a little chance for minor outcomes. The result could discover that the organic story beat is far more powerful than anything you would have planned in advance.